Who this helps
makers improving support content after launch without inventing policies or product behavior.
Post-Launch Support FAQ Update
Turn verified launch questions into a support FAQ update draft with answer owners, evidence links, escalation paths, and approval status.
Generated assets
- Question-theme list
- Draft answers
- Evidence links
- Escalation and approval fields
Workflow
- Group repeated verified questions.
- Assign an answer owner.
- Draft answers from current product and policy facts.
- Publish only after support and account-owner approval.
Operating boundary
LaunchListAI generates drafts and checklists. It does not log into platforms, bypass captcha, submit final listings, buy ads, or guarantee directory approval.
When the $99 directory pack is worth it
Start with the free browser-local launch kit. The paid pack is a fit when your canonical product URL, offer, audience, screenshots, and target channels are ready and you want a deeper reviewable handoff with proof-asset checks and status tracking. It is not a managed submission service: login, CAPTCHA, final submission, public posting, paid placement, email, DM, approval, ranking, traffic, sales, and revenue remain outside the pack.
Channel priority logic
- Cover access, pricing, privacy, and support blockers first.
- Separate known facts from planned features.
- Link to the source of truth.
Proof assets to prepare
- Current help and policy pages
- Approved product behavior
- Support owner
- Sensitive escalation route
Submission safety rules
- Do not invent features, timelines, refunds, security claims, or legal commitments.
- Do not include private support conversations.
- Publishing and sensitive replies require authorization.
Manual approval checkpoint
Before any final post or directory submission, review the product URL, screenshots, category, pricing, support link, claims, and platform rules. LaunchListAI keeps the work organized, but the account owner should approve public actions.
Can user messages be copied into the FAQ?
Use anonymized themes, not private conversations or identifying details.
Should planned features be presented as available?
No. Label future ideas clearly or leave them out.